Commentary for Bava Kamma 128:15

ולמ"ד חד בגנב וחד בטוען טענת גנב דנפקא ליה גנב מהתם בשלמא אם המצא תמצא לכדרבא בר אהילאי אבל כל הני פרטי למה לי

'In the waters', occurring twice in the text should not be treated as a generalisation followed by a specification, but as an amplification followed by a diminution followed in its turn by another amplification, to add everything. What, then, does it add in this case?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Which would otherwise not have been subject to the law. ');">¹³</span>

Explore commentary for Bava Kamma 128:15. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.